<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is It &#8211; The 5 Most Shocking Cash-Ins In Film History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.onthebox.com/2009/10/29/this-is-it-the-5-most-shocking-cash-ins-in-film-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.onthebox.com/2009/10/29/this-is-it-the-5-most-shocking-cash-ins-in-film-history/</link>
	<description>tv guide - tv listings - tv online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:32:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: McLovin</title>
		<link>http://blog.onthebox.com/2009/10/29/this-is-it-the-5-most-shocking-cash-ins-in-film-history/comment-page-1/#comment-66160</link>
		<dc:creator>McLovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onthebox.com/?p=9117#comment-66160</guid>
		<description>Whoa. Theres a fair bit of anger here and most of it pretty much uncalled for. (Surely the whole point of the article is that the authors tongue is very much in his cheek). Maybe the conqueror is a stretch but the rest of the films are pretty much dead-on, especially the Mike Tyson one. He was awesome back in the day though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa. Theres a fair bit of anger here and most of it pretty much uncalled for. (Surely the whole point of the article is that the authors tongue is very much in his cheek). Maybe the conqueror is a stretch but the rest of the films are pretty much dead-on, especially the Mike Tyson one. He was awesome back in the day though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boodie</title>
		<link>http://blog.onthebox.com/2009/10/29/this-is-it-the-5-most-shocking-cash-ins-in-film-history/comment-page-1/#comment-65927</link>
		<dc:creator>Boodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onthebox.com/?p=9117#comment-65927</guid>
		<description>I think you have mis-interpreted exactly what a cash-in movie means, This Is It probably ranks as a cash in movie, but by all accounts and reviewed by people I trust it is a rather spectacular tribute to the genius of Michael Jackson.

I&#039;m not sure how you have decided that The Conquerer was a cash in movie, cashing in on what? Was there a sudden upsurge in interest about Genghis Khan at that point in time, same thing with The Aviator, was Howard Hughes suddenly more in the news than normal?

Mike Tyson is just a train wreck and that was obviously a &quot;I need to make some money&quot; movie rather than cashing in on some sudden public interest in Iron Mike.

Your whole post is posited on an erroneous assumption of just what cashing in means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have mis-interpreted exactly what a cash-in movie means, This Is It probably ranks as a cash in movie, but by all accounts and reviewed by people I trust it is a rather spectacular tribute to the genius of Michael Jackson.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how you have decided that The Conquerer was a cash in movie, cashing in on what? Was there a sudden upsurge in interest about Genghis Khan at that point in time, same thing with The Aviator, was Howard Hughes suddenly more in the news than normal?</p>
<p>Mike Tyson is just a train wreck and that was obviously a &#8220;I need to make some money&#8221; movie rather than cashing in on some sudden public interest in Iron Mike.</p>
<p>Your whole post is posited on an erroneous assumption of just what cashing in means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Marni</title>
		<link>http://blog.onthebox.com/2009/10/29/this-is-it-the-5-most-shocking-cash-ins-in-film-history/comment-page-1/#comment-65762</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onthebox.com/?p=9117#comment-65762</guid>
		<description>The Conqueror isn&#039;t just a terrible film, it&#039;s a tragic one - the film was shot either near or on the site where the US military conducted nuclear weapons testing. Many cast members developed cancer in later life (including John Wayne) at a much higher rate than average. All for a really terrible film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Conqueror isn&#8217;t just a terrible film, it&#8217;s a tragic one &#8211; the film was shot either near or on the site where the US military conducted nuclear weapons testing. Many cast members developed cancer in later life (including John Wayne) at a much higher rate than average. All for a really terrible film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.onthebox.com/2009/10/29/this-is-it-the-5-most-shocking-cash-ins-in-film-history/comment-page-1/#comment-65738</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onthebox.com/?p=9117#comment-65738</guid>
		<description>This is perhaps the worst list I have ever seen based on anything. None of these films are cash grab films. Furthermore, I&#039;m Not There obviously wasn&#039;t made for people like you. You need to have an attention span of longer than 3 seconds to understand what&#039;s going on. Then again, I shouldn&#039;t except more than that from a guy who watches Tyson just for the knockouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is perhaps the worst list I have ever seen based on anything. None of these films are cash grab films. Furthermore, I&#8217;m Not There obviously wasn&#8217;t made for people like you. You need to have an attention span of longer than 3 seconds to understand what&#8217;s going on. Then again, I shouldn&#8217;t except more than that from a guy who watches Tyson just for the knockouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
